The Golden Globes Has Proven, Once Again, To Be Solely In Favour Of White Men

Last year's Golden Globes saw women stand up against misogyny in Hollywood. One year on, it appears that nothing has changed.

Has it all been in vain?

In January 2018, just three months after the publication of Jodi Kantor and Megan Twohey’s Pulitzer Prize-winning Harvey Weinstein investigation went viral, women in Hollywood assumed the role of Grim Reaper and descended onto the Golden Globes red carpet dressed entirely in black.

Almost everyone did as they were told and eschewed colour on one of the more celebrated nights of the year for a darkened equivalent.

The pertinent question though was: what did it accomplish in real terms? Who will it really make a difference for and how?

Part of the answer emerged on the first day of the year when Time’s Up was launched — an initiative from 300 women in the entertainment industry to fight systemic abuse in the workplace. 

At its core is “50/50 by 2020”, which aims for gender equality in Hollywood and a legal defence fund to help those in a less privileged position, particularly working-class women, to be protected from, and be able to report, harassment or abuse.

However, it seems that, despite this, the Boys Club of Hollywood has, once again, reigned supreme. 

This year’s Golden Globes look no different to the 2018 nominations some endless protests later. 

With actors from movies like The Farewell, Little Women, Honey Boy, and A Beautiful Day in the Neighborhood being nominated, there was no consideration for the female directors of those films (and even more telling, female writers also did not get any nominations)—or any others, for that matter—and the nominees in the major categories were overwhelmingly white and male.

The Best Motion Picture – Foreign Language category was the big exception to that rule, The Farewell (directed by Lulu Wang), Les Misérables (Ladj Ly), Pain and Glory (Pedro Almodóvar), Parasite (Bong Joon-ho), and Portrait of a Lady on Fire (Céline Sciamma), along with a few others, but Bong Joon-ho was the only one to break out of there into the overall director nominations, leaving the overall picture pretty bleak.

Women were entirely shut out of the Best Motion Picture, directing, and screenplay categories with the exception of 1917, nominated for Best Motion Picture, being co-written by Krysty Wilson-Cairns, and you could almost say the same for people of colour. (Also, Frozen 2, nominated for Best Motion Picture – Animated, was co-directed and written by Jennifer Lee.)

Fans were also horrified that certain actresses were snubbed in roles that boasted thespian sublimity; Caitriona Balfe (Outlander), Lupita Nyong'o (Us), Constance Wu (Hustlers), Florence Pugh (Little Women) and Zendaya (Euphoria).

Unsurprisingly, these are not isolated incidents. 

Since 2000, the Hollywood Foreign Press Association (HFPA) has only ever nominated four women for Best Director, among a sea of 100 male nominees. 

The absence of women has previously been “explained” away by way of production houses failing to green-light female-penned and directed pictures.

But this year, tired excuses such as these with a roster of brilliant film snubs – including Greta Gerwig’s Little Women, Lorene Scafaria’s Hustlers, and Kassi Lemmons’ Harriet – don't fly. 

In their place are problematic and divisive cinematics such as Todd Philip's Joker and Scorcese's The Irishman.

Female directors are important.

Research shows that when women are in the director’s chair, they hire more female editors, writers, cinematographers and producers as a result.

Their direction has a crucial filter-down effect on Hollywood’s badly damaged ecosystem. 

And yet, without the spotlight that these women deserve, they cannot create visibility for others to follow in their footsteps.

As Dame Heather Rabbatts, Chair of Time’s Up UK, tells the BBC: “The more that we see women directors coming through, the greater encouragement that will give to other women to believe that they too can do these roles."

Will women and people of colour see their time at the Golden Globes in categories not completely dedicated to them? Who’s to say, but right now, it’s wholly disappointing.

Main image by @caitrionambalfe

READ MORE: Are High Heels Still A Sign Of Oppression?

READ MORE: Finland Is Now Completely Run By Women

You May Also Like